Mrs Roops

Indeed, you sound amused... Nevertheless the penny still has not dropped, has it? Rabbiting on about litigation and FOIA requests by partisan organisations with a false narrative to promulgate is ultimately irrelevant. Its irrelevant as such judicial shenanigans by bad actors are theatre and a charade to impress and keep on side gullible saps. The fact remains that Ivermectin is not the medicinal panacea for dealing with Covid - it never has been and it never will. The bitter pill for you to swallow is that you and countless others have been conned, lied to and mugged. For the first time in your life, grow up, put on a pair of big boy trousers and eschew the weird alternate reality that has been your comfort zone thus far.

Never lost a defamation case? Really? That said, your remonstrating is not only a load of hot air and deflective gibberish, its also entirely irrelevant as it does not alter the fact that Ivermectin is not a suitable medication against covid for reasons previously explained.

You were already on it, since cancelled. He had five punters on the list. Ridiculous.

Fuck that! All facilities afforded to you by The Corner is a granted privilege and not a self-determined prerogative or right. I've removed all five of your blocked accounts and removed your posting rights for 48 hours.

Boom! @Carl Sway, you should've listened to RK, You're becoming a distraction. Undo the block facility or I will do it for you.

I made no apology, veiled or otherwise, but your veiled retraction is noted.

Yet again you deflect from answering the question... You would take the Novavax jab because you indicated you would, As for the remainder of your farrago of fallaciousness I was the first punter to raise the spectre of Covid and the connection to Wuhan before it made headlines, It would be several weeks before you fully engaged in the conspiracy nonsense (Wolfie was the first to allude to a detailed conspiracy). Your immediate reaction was to deny the existence of Covid, No doubt your delay in engaging was due to you taking a few weeks to source appropriate tin-hattery from Messrs Sid Bonkers and Sid Slackjaw, both of whom have led you by the nose from the outset. As for Ivermectin you are ill served by quoting Project Veritas, an extreme right-wing disinformation 'project' with links to the Proud Boys. I can find no authoritative peer-reviewed article that says the anti-parasitic medication is suitable either as a prophylactic or therapeutic treatment for Covid. OTOH there are countless articles confirming Ivermectin as unsuitable for Covid including this one. Billy, I asserted that your hypocrisy, selective memory, ignorance, third rate mind, false facts, fake news and bogus science meant that you were pretty much done here. Its a measure of your abject stupidity that your response was to spend an hour and forty-five minutes concocting a cornucopia of crap that only served to confirm every aspect I made of your character. Marvellous.

No apology is required as none is due. Um..."woman beater"?

No

I'm not sure if KB is that way inclined. Still, whilst The Corner is an inclusive church its brave of you to come out of the closet.

Your hypocrisy in constantly barking out "answer the question" whilst pointedly avoiding answering any yourself is noted. In fact the history of mRNA has been discussed before and reasserted many times... With your hypocrisy, selective memory, ignorance, third rate mind, false facts, fake news and bogus science this would, in the normal course of events, mean that your pretty much done here but with your zero cognitive abilities you'll no doubt carry on regardless. So, with that in mind, what happened to your prediction for the 22nd May 2022? Also given that you're not "anti-vax" have you taken the Novavax jab yet? Do tell...

As much chance as your work 'ramping up', you unemployable oddity.

The question has already been answered as part of a comprehensive analysis by m'learned colleague. I'm surprised that a punter who isn't a "mug/thicko/Sid Slackjaw/tinfoil hat weirdo" missed this. As you now appear to be a stickler for 'answering the question' perhaps you could now present an overdue report on your scoop that 194 world leaders were to convene on the 22nd May 2022 and sign over statutory powers to the WHO bureaucrats in Geneva. As I recall you were in a visible state of excitement at the thought of covering me in egg so I'm curious as to why we've since heard nothing from you on this matter.

You're right of course, which is why for the past few weeks I have in fact scaled down the fact-checking not only for the reason you allude to but also its now obvious to the vast majority of Corner punters that he is not the current affairs sage that he proports to be.

KB, stop it - you're jumping around like a cat on a hot tin roof flying off in different tangents, constantly looking for different angles which always seem to be sourced from your Slackjaw news feed which you obviously spend hours on. Firstly you said Covid 19 didn't exist, then it did but the pandemic was actually a plot hatched by the Chinese to dominate the world, next Covid was, after all, 'The Great Reset's' chosen mechanism to financially control mankind. Bill Gates was dragged into the mix courtesy of one of your join-the dots conspiracies. Elsewhere you've just hinted that the Democrats are about to steal another election using a new Covid wave as an excuse. Intermixed in all this we've had an endless stream of scare stories which upon closer examination were found to be totally without merit. Give it a rest.

No, you're more interested in cementing your pole position in the 'Brown-nose of the year' award.

Lovely. This is a puff-piece in one of many EU Corporate Communication's (aka 'the PR department') glossy mags which extol the virtues of EU membership. At least the EU's PR department had the decency to say, "The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union". However I have an issue with "Our articles are written by independent science journalists." Funny, I thought Ms Whiting was the well known journo who specialises in Italian politics and er...food. Still, you've cited the article so I'll run with it... In fact the article is a rebuttal compendium of all the previous lies slavishly regurgitated from the Slackjaw News Service. Firstly, Ms Whiting describes the mRNA vaccines as "vaccines", not "its not really a vaccine" nor are they "therapeutics" Secondly, the author confirms that mRNA vaccines do not alter a person's DNA. Thirdly, nor does the vaccine give you cancer. Fourthly, corners were not cut in the clinical trials and approval process. Fifthly, and I am not surprised you made no mention of this, that there is a whole paragraph with a header that says, mRNA vaccines are not entirely new". Indeed they are not as I have previously explained ad nauseum. The error in your cited article is poor sub-editing or rather no sub-editing. It should have said "the worlds first mRNA Covid vaccine" but because you are a gullible mug you creamed yourself and ran with it. Time for another egg wash bath...

I've never articulated such sentiments. Stop making stuff up.

This is the fourth question in as many days in which you're "interested" in my opinion. I suspect that your "interest" is limited to generating a 'gotcha' moment rather than any genuine enquiry or clarification... Still, what do you mean by "alarming numbers"? Quantify and explain why they are "alarming".

All of this avoids answering the question, why do you repeat the same lie over and over again? Before you answer take a few minutes to educate yourself and understand what a vaccine is, paying particular attention to the difference between prophylactic and therapeutic. Hopefully next time you won't end up looking like a totally clueless pratt who's just immersed himself in egg sauce. Again.

Naturally your mug gene draws you to Bert Weinstein (producer of the podcast), a noted "Covid-19 contrarian and spreader of disinformation". Weinstein has in the past admitted he "misstated" a study that erroneously alleged ivermectin as a 100% effective protocol for the prevention of Covid. As for Nawaz, I have much respect for a Muslim who advocates secular Islam however he will not resonate with viewers if he equates his time in an Egyptian prison to life in the UK. Your problem is that your central premise is predicated on the notion that mRNA vaccines are "experimental" when they are not. Why do you keep repeating the lie? Were you expecting a different result? Remind us again about that old definition of insanity quote you mentioned in the proceeding post.

Are these your own thoughts or have you re-hashed someone else's opinion? Whatever...you appear to have conflated several issues in an effort to avoid acknowledging the obvious. FWIW, I don't think anyone wants to return to lockdowns and enforced social distancing but we'll see.

I don't ponder absurdities.

A fatuous question to say the least. The answer is that's for me to know and for you to ponder, in any case what relevance has this to with my previous reply?