Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Allison Pearson, Telegraph Columnist.


Last Cunt Standing

Recommended Posts

Where does one begin in an assessment of this talentless little phlegm wad? Bad enough that she peddles her shit for The Telegraph, a decaying organ now more past its sell by than Harvest Festival Figs. She’s carved out the traditional columnist niche of right-leaning contrarian, spraying her inaccurate venom over any target she thinks might get Colonel Huffton-Tuffton spitting into his kippers. But it’s a new level of Cuntery in action when, despite pronouncing herself a free speech champion beseiged by Woke and oversensitive types, she has a Twitter falling out with a man later identified as a GSK scientist and responds with outrageous threats of litigation, suggestions she will have him sacked with a phone call to his CEO, and tells him he is “finished”. The man apologised, retracted the perfectly fair-comment tweets, and offered to donate £100 to a charity of her choosing. She is still not satisfied.

Personally I’d have gone Arkell v Pressdram (1971) in response, and would have spent the morning camped in their reception area demanding the Telegraph fire her summarily. Cunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

Where does one begin in an assessment of this talentless little phlegm wad? Bad enough that she peddles her shit for The Telegraph, a decaying organ now more past its sell by than Harvest Festival Figs. She’s carved out the traditional columnist niche of right-leaning contrarian, spraying her inaccurate venom over any target she thinks might get Colonel Huffton-Tuffton spitting into his kippers. But it’s a new level of Cuntery in action when, despite pronouncing herself a free speech champion beseiged by Woke and oversensitive types, she has a Twitter falling out with a man later identified as a GSK scientist and responds with outrageous threats of litigation, suggestions she will have him sacked with a phone call to his CEO, and tells him he is “finished”. The man apologised, retracted the perfectly fair-comment tweets, and offered to donate £100 to a charity of her choosing. She is still not satisfied.

Personally I’d have gone Arkell v Pressdram (1971) in response, and would have spent the morning camped in their reception area demanding the Telegraph fire her summarily. Cunt.

I'm disappointed you left out the part where Peter Hitchens originally tagged Pearson and shit stirred by bringing it to her attention.

The man went tittle-tattling with his outburst of faux outrage, despite supposedly being a last bastion of common sense and good old fashioned, thick-skinned British manliness.

A hypocritical wanker extraordinare, he moans on incessantly about the injustice of cancel culture and then goes snitching to teacher. This Pearson character is undoubtedly a cunt, but I can't quite summon the same amount of invective bile that I reserve for Hitchens. His dead brother was a smarmy, know it all cunt, too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Decimus said:

I'm disappointed you left out the part where Peter Hitchens originally tagged Pearson and shit stirred by bringing it to her attention.

The man went tittle-tattling with his outburst of faux outrage, despite supposedly being a last bastion of common sense and good old fashioned, thick-skinned British manliness.

A hypocritical wanker extraordinare, he moans on incessantly about the injustice of cancel culture and then goes snitching to teacher. This Pearson character is undoubtedly a cunt, but I can't quite summon the same amount of invective bile that I reserve for Hitchens. His dead brother was a smarmy, know it all cunt, too.

At least Hitch had talent. His brother is without doubt the runt of the litter who could never escape Christopher’s shadow. The man’s a cunt. Odd that he snuggles up to a tax-dodging bankrupt tart like Pearson. Kill ‘em all I say.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hammer of Cunts said:

Why would anyone give a fuck what goes on on Twitter?

Millennial, leg waxing, over-sensitive faggots. And stupid fucking white women, brainwashed by 10 years of media induced white guilt that has convinced them to make reparations by offering themselves as playthings for apes.

That about sums it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Eric Cuntman said:

Millennial, leg waxing, over-sensitive faggots. And stupid fucking white women, brainwashed by 10 years of media induced white guilt that has convinced them to make reparations by offering themselves as playthings for apes.

That about sums it up.

I was reading a long magazine piece the other day about Brenton Tarrant, the Christchurch shooter. Apparently the profiling court psychologist found that one of the most provocative things Tarrant was exposed to was “white extinction pornography”. Mrs LCS had no idea what it was when I asked her, so a few clicks on a search engine followed. I’d give it a miss if I were you Eric, it will almost certainly lead to a stroke. The hemiplegic kind. 

You’re into guns too, aren’t you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

I was reading a long magazine piece the other day about Brenton Tarrant, the Christchurch shooter. Apparently the profiling court psychologist found that one of the most provocative things Tarrant was exposed to was “white extinction pornography”. Mrs LCS had no idea what it was when I asked her, so a few clicks on a search engine followed. I’d give it a miss if I were you Eric, it will almost certainly lead to a stroke. The hemiplegic kind. 

You’re into guns too, aren’t you?

I am into guns LCS. Can you think of any words that rhyme with 'trigger'?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Decimus said:

I'm disappointed you left out the part where Peter Hitchens originally tagged Pearson and shit stirred by bringing it to her attention.

The man went tittle-tattling with his outburst of faux outrage, despite supposedly being a last bastion of common sense and good old fashioned, thick-skinned British manliness.

A hypocritical wanker extraordinare, he moans on incessantly about the injustice of cancel culture and then goes snitching to teacher. This Pearson character is undoubtedly a cunt, but I can't quite summon the same amount of invective bile that I reserve for Hitchens. His dead brother was a smarmy, know it all cunt, too.

Peter Hitchens writes for the Daily Heil, or it might be the Heil on Sunday, so is required to be a dribbling imbecile. The irony of him droning on about how fragile snowflakes are yet all the while having comments disabled on his articles (presumably because he doesn’t want to read “wanker” a thousand times) appears entirely lost on him. Though he would never admit it, he trades on his brothers’ reputation while simultaneously purveying the sort of controversialist nonsense his paymasters instruct him to. He takes deliberately provocative positions not through any underlying principles, as his lifelong journey from teenage Marxist to middle aged Reactionary shows, but because he is paid to be outrageous. He is an intellectual whore - one of many - and belongs in the stocks being pelted with the sort of shit he is so happy to fling.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

Trevor Brooking was a huge fan, and he was a very astute judge, as I remember.

Stop laughing.

Trevor Brooking is one of the still breathing hammers that isn't a cunt, bar Harry Redknap. The greatest manager to never manage England along with Bryan Clough. One reputedly liked brown paper envelopes, and the other liked clumping pitch invaders. I'd imagine both of these traits would have ensured management of the Scottish national side... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Decimus said:

I'm disappointed you left out the part where Peter Hitchens originally tagged Pearson and shit stirred by bringing it to her attention.

The man went tittle-tattling with his outburst of faux outrage, despite supposedly being a last bastion of common sense and good old fashioned, thick-skinned British manliness.

A hypocritical wanker extraordinare, he moans on incessantly about the injustice of cancel culture and then goes snitching to teacher. This Pearson character is undoubtedly a cunt, but I can't quite summon the same amount of invective bile that I reserve for Hitchens. His dead brother was a smarmy, know it all cunt, too.

Summoning the name Peter Hitchens should be enough to raise the blood pressure of every quality punter, bar @judgetwi who probably has a poster of him sandwiched between Farage and Nick Ferrari.

I'd like to kick Hitchens in the bollocks and see if his stiff british lip holds out.

Surely he's been cunted before? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

Peter Hitchens writes for the Daily Heil, or it might be the Heil on Sunday, so is required to be a dribbling imbecile. The irony of him droning on about how fragile snowflakes are yet all the while having comments disabled on his articles (presumably because he doesn’t want to read “wanker” a thousand times) appears entirely lost on him. Though he would never admit it, he trades on his brothers’ reputation while simultaneously purveying the sort of controversialist nonsense his paymasters instruct him to. He takes deliberately provocative positions not through any underlying principles, as his lifelong journey from teenage Marxist to middle aged Reactionary shows, but because he is paid to be outrageous. He is an intellectual whore - one of many - and belongs in the stocks being pelted with the sort of shit he is so happy to fling.

Fuck all ‘intellectual’ about Peter, LCS. His brother on the other hand was tremendous and flawed. He went from being a Marxist to centre-right which kind of goes with age. But at least he lived it, saw it and was memorably eloquent. I enjoyed his talents and can even forgive him having Martin Amis up his hoop, back in the day. His brother is a lightweight fraud, an intellectual midget who really should have had the family cancer gene instead of Hitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

Fuck all ‘intellectual’ about Peter, LCS. His brother on the other hand was tremendous and flawed. He went from being a Marxist to centre-right which kind of goes with age. But at least he lived it, saw it and was memorably eloquent. I enjoyed his talents and can even forgive him having Martin Amis up his hoop, back in the day. His brother is a lightweight fraud, an intellectual midget who really should have had the family cancer gene instead of Hitch.

Well, quite. I meant “intellectual whore” in the same way you meant “intellectual midget”. My view is that he rents out his mind and mouth for whoever is paying, not that he is a mix of Kirsty Wark and Belle du Jour. 

I too was a big fan of the Hitch back in the day, and perusing my bookshelf I see my signed copy of No One Left to Lie To is still there next to my prized David Berglas. I also enjoyed his demolition of Mother Theresa, I suspect not a popular choice with Brother Peter the Christian. My reading it at work waiting for my wife to clock off did cause a memorably terse exchange with a hospital chaplain one evening, before an elderly patient invited him to “fuck off back to the Rectory”, which has stuck with me 20 odd years on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

Peter Hitchens writes for the Daily Heil, or it might be the Heil on Sunday, so is required to be a dribbling imbecile. The irony of him droning on about how fragile snowflakes are yet all the while having comments disabled on his articles (presumably because he doesn’t want to read “wanker” a thousand times) appears entirely lost on him. Though he would never admit it, he trades on his brothers’ reputation while simultaneously purveying the sort of controversialist nonsense his paymasters instruct him to. He takes deliberately provocative positions not through any underlying principles, as his lifelong journey from teenage Marxist to middle aged Reactionary shows, but because he is paid to be outrageous. He is an intellectual whore - one of many - and belongs in the stocks being pelted with the sort of shit he is so happy to fling.

Spot on... from my vantage point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He does say some good things though .. here is a Peter Hitchins quote "In 20 years' time Eton will be just a pricey Bog Lane comprehensive flying the Black Lives Matter flag on its gatehouse. The cleverest revolutions are the ones where everything looks the same from the outside, but it has been totally altered on the inside.".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Eric Cuntman said:

I did get the joke... I mean before you edited it unnecessarily to explain it. I'm not quite as thick as you may think. 

Not at all Eric. You’d be struggling to make the top two dozen of morons round here in my view. And I edited really only to join the dots for our remedial cousins. I’m sorry you felt impugned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 12 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...