Mrs Roops Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 I'm referring to the current "Upskirting" bill currently before the House. This was previously introduced as a private members bill but was kiboshed by Tory duffer Christopher Chope who filibusted the proposed legislation a few weeks ago. The government has now sought to include the issue as part of the Voyeurism (Offences) Bill but now Labour MP Stella Creasey has thrown a spanner in the works by submitting an amendment which would increase the courts sentencing power if "misogyny" was seen as an aggravating feature. Parliamentary Amendments, when used correctly should only be used to amend the wording of Bills, commonly when proposed legislation is being passed between the two houses and not as a device to pander feminist ideology. Forget that voyeuristic photography is probably sexually motivated and not driven by misogyny, the latter would be very difficult to prove. There are plenty of robust laws to deal with the results of misogyny but I see no sense in ill-judged attempts to codify another thought crime. Most misogynists have deep-seated inadequacies and are easy to exploit and manipulate in any case. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southerncunt Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Speaking from a considerable distance in this case, I agree, bringing misogyny into the argument muddies the waters just a little. Upskirting would have little to do with being a woman hater, and more to do with being a sad, dirty fucker with sexual inadequacy issues, but that’s just my opinion. Wanting to make it a battle of the sexes doesn’t help anybody. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camberwell gypsy Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 9 minutes ago, southerncunt said: Speaking from a considerable distance in this case, I agree, bringing misogyny into the argument muddies the waters just a little. Upskirting would have little to do with being a woman hater, and more to do with being a sad, dirty fucker with sexual inadequacy issues, but that’s just my opinion. Wanting to make it a battle of the sexes doesn’t help anybody. Bloody hell SC, you got a like from Roops. That's worth 10 likes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miles Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 35 minutes ago, Mrs Roops said: I'm referring to the current "Upskirting" bill currently before the House. This was previously introduced as a private members bill but was kiboshed by Tory duffer Christopher Chope who filibusted the proposed legislation a few weeks ago. The government has now sought to include the issue as part of the Voyeurism (Offences) Bill but now Labour MP Stella Creasey has thrown a spanner in the works by submitting an amendment which would increase the courts sentencing power if "misogyny" was seen as an aggravating feature. Parliamentary Amendments, when used correctly should only be used to amend the wording of Bills, commonly when proposed legislation is being passed between the two houses and not as a device to pander feminist ideology. Forget that voyeuristic photography is probably sexually motivated and not driven by misogyny, the latter would be very difficult to prove. There are plenty of robust laws to deal with the results of misogyny but I see no sense in ill-judged attempts to codify another thought crime. Most misogynists have deep-seated inadequacies and are easy to exploit and manipulate in any case. The problem is that it might end up all too easy for people to make untrue allegations against others as seems to be happening with some of these "paedo hunters" http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6129827/Paedophile-hunter-34-jailed-15-weeks-FALSELY-claiming-innocent-man-groomed-teenagers.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 36 minutes ago, Mrs Roops said: I'm referring to the current "Upskirting" bill currently before the House. This was previously introduced as a private members bill but was kiboshed by Tory duffer Christopher Chope who filibusted the proposed legislation a few weeks ago. The government has now sought to include the issue as part of the Voyeurism (Offences) Bill but now Labour MP Stella Creasey has thrown a spanner in the works by submitting an amendment which would increase the courts sentencing power if "misogyny" was seen as an aggravating feature. Parliamentary Amendments, when used correctly should only be used to amend the wording of Bills, commonly when proposed legislation is being passed between the two houses and not as a device to pander feminist ideology. Forget that voyeuristic photography is probably sexually motivated and not driven by misogyny, the latter would be very difficult to prove. There are plenty of robust laws to deal with the results of misogyny but I see no sense in ill-judged attempts to codify another thought crime. Most misogynists have deep-seated inadequacies and are easy to exploit and manipulate in any case. Be that as it may, something needs to be done about Neil’s rampant selfie-stick and periscope assisted voyeurism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nocti Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 13 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said: Be that as it may, something needs to be done about Neil’s rampant selfie-stick and periscope assisted voyeurism. We could build a website? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, nocti said: We could build a website? We could hire Roops as a consultant. She’s got it all - experience moderating fringe, dark corners of the internet and a propensity to post pictures of her rat online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 10 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said: and a propensity to post pictures of her rat online. No need,I followed her round Sainsbury's,I've got fucking loads! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decimus Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Did that fucking pig Jess Phillips have anything to do with this? Stella Creasey aside, I can detect her trotters all over this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 1 hour ago, William T.D. Stickers said: We could hire Roops as a consultant. She’s got it all - experience moderating fringe, dark corners of the internet and a propensity to post pictures of her rat online..... .....with a cute little tail made of string. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Cunt Standing Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Decimus said: Did that fucking pig Jess Phillips have anything to do with this? Stella Creasey aside, I can detect her trotters all over this. The oinking Madame Thornberry will no doubt have her say on this subject too. She has no personal reason to fear upskirting from drooling perverts mind you, her thighs have chafed together for so many years now they have effectively fused to form a fleshy bridge beneath her overgrown lady garden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Once again proud kilt-wearing Scotsmen have been overlooked by this bunch of labiacentric harridans. You have no fucking idea what a hate crime really is until you experience the sort of harassment we suffer at weddings once the blue-rinse brigade get a couple of sherries in them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggerycock Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Ah but, the thing about 'progressive' law (for which read 'multicultural-multisexual identity politics' law) is that it's deeply, deeply caring. It cares about feelings.....well, the feelings of those it's decided belong to a victim group of some sort, that is. It's empathy law, not patriarchal law which brutally emphasises oppressive, heartless elements like the need to test actual evidence in a lawful tribunal under the rules of due process. Thanks to the enlightened interventions of Messrs Blair, Brown, Cameron and May, the statute book and the principles that once informed it have undergone a radical makeover. Gone are all those toxic masculine/patriarchal attacks on victims (now a protected group consisting of anyone who claims to be one) like the presumption of innocence, due process of law and of course those horribly male, horribly white criminal statutes. You know, the ones that insisted that, for justice to be served, and to ensure that no one was wrongly convicted, criminal acts must be spelled out with the utmost precision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Cunt Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 6 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: I'm referring to the current "Upskirting" bill currently before the House. This was previously introduced as a private members bill but was kiboshed by Tory duffer Christopher Chope who filibusted the proposed legislation a few weeks ago. The government has now sought to include the issue as part of the Voyeurism (Offences) Bill but now Labour MP Stella Creasey has thrown a spanner in the works by submitting an amendment which would increase the courts sentencing power if "misogyny" was seen as an aggravating feature. Parliamentary Amendments, when used correctly should only be used to amend the wording of Bills, commonly when proposed legislation is being passed between the two houses and not as a device to pander feminist ideology. Forget that voyeuristic photography is probably sexually motivated and not driven by misogyny, the latter would be very difficult to prove. There are plenty of robust laws to deal with the results of misogyny but I see no sense in ill-judged attempts to codify another thought crime. Most misogynists have deep-seated inadequacies and are easy to exploit and manipulate in any case. Yeah. Instead of dealing with the Brexit/ no Brexit tremendous pile of shit, lets spend more time and energy on splitting hairs in the minutiae of some pervert flogging bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 Sisterhood, feminists.....all the same man-hating misandrists out to ruin anything and everything red blooded blokes enjoy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubby Pecker Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 2 hours ago, Cuntybaws said: Once again proud kilt-wearing Scotsmen have been overlooked by this bunch of labiacentric harridans. You have no fucking idea what a hate crime really is until you experience the sort of harassment we suffer at weddings once the blue-rinse brigade get a couple of sherries in them. And you're happy enough to be chalked up as another conquest on their Zimmer frames, you dirty auld cunt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nocti Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 2 hours ago, Cuntybaws said: Once again proud kilt-wearing Scotsmen have been overlooked by this bunch of labiacentric harridans. You have no fucking idea what a hate crime really is until you experience the sort of harassment we suffer at weddings once the blue-rinse brigade get a couple of sherries in them. Surely with the sub-zero temperatures, the appendages shrink to such an amount that they'd need a decent SLR with a lens to rival the Hubble telescope if they're going to get a shot of anything, giving you enough of a clue and ample time to spin round a lay a nut on the dithering old cunts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 32 minutes ago, Stubby Pecker said: And you're happy enough to be chalked up as another conquest on their Zimmer frames, you dirty auld cunt I really couldn't tell you whether the blue rinse brigade have matching collar and cuffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 20 minutes ago, nocti said: Surely with the sub-zero temperatures, the appendages shrink to such an amount that they'd need a decent SLR with a lens to rival the Hubble telescope if they're going to get a shot of anything, giving you enough of a clue and ample time to spin round a lay a nut on the dithering old cunts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubby Pecker Posted September 4, 2018 Report Share Posted September 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said: I really couldn't tell you whether the blue rinse brigade have matching collar and cuffs. As a true scotch, you'd be far too pissed to remember. Good man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted September 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2018 13 hours ago, White Cunt said: Yeah. Instead of dealing with the Brexit/ no Brexit tremendous pile of shit, lets spend more time and energy on splitting hairs in the minutiae of some pervert flogging bill. Life must go on outside the Brexit debate, in any case aside from parliamentary committee business and Ministerial & Prime Ministers Questions on the subject there's not much for either house to debate until the final EU exit terms are announced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miles Posted September 5, 2018 Report Share Posted September 5, 2018 17 hours ago, Cuntybaws said: Once again proud kilt-wearing Scotsmen have been overlooked by this bunch of labiacentric harridans. You have no fucking idea what a hate crime really is until you experience the sort of harassment we suffer at weddings once the blue-rinse brigade get a couple of sherries in them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
and Posted September 5, 2018 Report Share Posted September 5, 2018 3 hours ago, Wybunbury Bertie said: Why are those blokes wearing skirts, are they trannies? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
and Posted September 5, 2018 Report Share Posted September 5, 2018 21 hours ago, Last Cunt Standing said: her thighs have chafed together for so many years now they have effectively fused to form a fleshy bridge beneath her overgrown lady garden. Like a fucking Mermaid without the forked tail, but strangely, still still smelling of kippers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
and Posted September 5, 2018 Report Share Posted September 5, 2018 On 9/4/2018 at 2:24 PM, nocti said: We could build a website? There's already plenty of websites promoting this sort of pervery...er...bloke down the pub told me. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.