Driverless truck and car cunts

[Stubby Pecker]

1 hour ago, Punkape said:

I bet you like male cabin crew for hanky-panky-pinky....

lol.

Fuck off.

Reported for going off a decent topic and generally being a fucking pointless, annoying fucking one trick pony cunt.

[Eric Cuntman]

3 minutes ago, Decimus said:

Eric, I can imagine you giving this speech in parliament in your capacity as the future right honourable member for Jaywick.

You might be just the sort of cove who can save us from a future of feeling the lick o'the cat wielded by a race of sentient Breville toastie machines.

Self aware toasters? You've not only been hacked by the Rat, you've been deeply affected by the plight of Dave Lister too.

[Guest Lady Penelope]

4 minutes ago, Ape said:

Yes, you got me there. I’ll just struggle on with the real world friends I have instead.

You haven't got any real world friends.

[Eric Cuntman]

5 minutes ago, Ape said:

Eric, I fucking love you. 

I know.

[Ape™️]

1 minute ago, Eric Cuntman said:

Self aware toasters? You've not only been hacked by the Rat, you've been deeply affected by the plight of Dave Lister too.

Just imagine if you requested, via Bluetooth, a toasted muffin, and ended up with a toasted tea cake? It’s a horrifying thought.

[Ape™️]

Just now, Eric Cuntman said:

I know.

Is it that fucking obvious?

[Guest Lady Penelope]

25 minutes ago, Bubba C said:

What if they’re proven to be safer and to decrease the likelihood of accidents?   

In some respects railways have been semi automated for 140 years with signalling with automatic lockings and failsafe automatic braking systems. The airways have mostly  been basically semi automated for about 30 years, that the same will happen with the roads is inevitable.

 

[Ape™️]

7 minutes ago, Stubby Pecker said:

Reported for going off a decent topic and generally being a fucking pointless, annoying fucking one trick pony cunt.

The amazing thing is - the little flid was the creator of this nomination. However, this doesn’t detract from what a stupid cunt he is.

[Wolfie]

33 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

I can see the logic in the argument for driverless cars. But I am opposed to it for the reason that technology, if given too much autonomy will and already is rendering us useless as a species. People need to learn practical skills, even ones as simple as taking responsibility for our own safety when crossing a road. How many times have we all despaired as we have had to brake to avoid hitting a gormless fucking kid who's just stepped off a kerb, not paying attention to anything but their phone. That's why we have to smash up our suspension on speed humps when driving in a 2 mile radius of a school. The green cross code is long forgotten and kids are not expected to look, listen etc. Same with tech which drives your car while you stare at a screen, unaware of what's going on around you. There are shit drivers as Bill has mentioned, well ban the cunts then and leave driving to the competent. If we allow technology to do everything for us, we will as a species end up a gormless race of useless cunts, reliant on computers to make every decision and have no practical skills or purpose. Most of us as kids, could probably dismantle, repair and reassemble a bicycle, change a plug and pitch a tent. Most 15 year olds now can't do anything but text, download 'choons' and upload photos of their genitalia. Technology should assist us to achieve, not achieve for us.

There are already 18m female motorists on UK roads, Eric. 

[Ape™️]

1 minute ago, Lady Penelope said:

I some respect railways have been semi automated for 140 years with signalling with automatic lockings and failsafe automatic braking systems. The airways have mostly  been basically semi automated for about 30 years, that the same will happen with the roads is inevitable.

 

Trains travel along fixed, predetermined routes. Planes have a huge amount of space around them and have entire departments of people monitoring their every move. Neither example is comparable to cars on roads.

Fuck off.

[ratcum]

1 hour ago, Lady Penelope said:

@ratcum is more likely to be the sort who spots a dog tethered outside a shop and lets his cat out to taunt it by encouraging it to walk around it just outside the range of the dog's lead.

don't you @ratcum me you rancid old trout. Stick to dogging down Abergele station

[Guest Lady Penelope]

4 minutes ago, ratcum said:

don't you @ratcum me you rancid old trout. Stick to dogging down Abergele station

You would also tether your own dog so that your cat could torment it.

[Eric Cuntman]

9 minutes ago, Wolfie said:

There are already 18m female motorists on UK roads, Eric. 

I'm reminded of the uproar from the feminists after Jim Davidson refused to stay on a Boeing 747 after he discovered a woman was driving it. What effectively ended his TV career however was the amount of fuss and wailing perpetrated by Brian Dowling after Jimbo used the Phrase 'shirtlifter' in a conversation with him. The fucking despicable little cry-baby shit stabbing cunt.

[Bubba C]

19 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

Why not just increase standards of competence required to be licensed to operate a vehicle, and strictly enforce the prohibition of those who fail to reach or maintain those standards? Surely it's better to encourage humanity to achieve competence rather than give them a magic rolling box and let them continue to be ignorant fucking spastics. Let the flids lick the windows on a bus instead.

I agree wholeheartedly with this, and most of your last post, (but I didn’t want to break the internet by quoting it, are you Dan, by the way?!).

Apparently new drivers are taught how to change oil, pour in screen wash and change a tyre, etc., when surely the emphasis should be on how to drive the fucking car not fix it, as most cars pretty much drive themselves (irony noted) these days. 

[Eric Cuntman]

8 minutes ago, ratcum said:

don't you @ratcum me you rancid old trout. Stick to dogging down Abergele station

@🐀

[Bubba C]

3 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

@🐀

@rat🐀🍆💦

[Guest Quincy Cockfingers]

1 hour ago, Eddie said:

To help with the meth come down?

Spitmeth.

[ratcum]

2 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

@🐀

Humpty Dumpty shat on the wall

Because he was clinically obese

All the King's horses and all the King's men

Were engaged in obscene inter-species acts

[Guest Lady Penelope]

Judge with his new girlfriend.

[Ape™️]

2 minutes ago, ratcum said:

Humpty Dumpty shat on the wall

Because he was clinically obese

All the King's horses and all the King's men

Were engaged in obscene inter-species acts

If technology ever allows, I’d love to take a ride inside your mind, Rattus. It’d be like acid and mushrooms, with a heroin chaser.

[Eric Cuntman]

1 hour ago, ratcum said:

Humpty Dumpty shat on the wall

Because he was clinically obese

All the King's horses and all the King's men

Were engaged in obscene inter-species acts

I agree with @Ape. I would love to journey through the workings of your cerebellum. I'm not sure whether you should be placed in a very very secure facility, or placed in charge of the planet. I think I'd opt for the latter, just for shits and giggles.

[Eric Cuntman]

1 hour ago, Bubba C said:

I agree wholeheartedly with this, and most of your last post, (but I didn’t want to break the internet by quoting it, are you Dan, by the way?!).

Apparently new drivers are taught how to change oil, pour in screen wash and change a tyre, etc., when surely the emphasis should be on how to drive the fucking car not fix it, as most cars pretty much drive themselves (irony noted) these days. 

Give it a like then, you cheese on toast munching, tight-arsed valley dwelling cunt.... But you've made a very good point regarding the futility of teaching learner drivers basic maintenance. Especially as even operating the bonnet catch on most new cars requires a few grands worth of specialist equipment, a Snap-On laptop to reset everything afterwards and will probably invalidate the warranty. 

[Guest Bill Stickers]

9 hours ago, Eric Cuntman said:

I can see the logic in the argument for driverless cars. But I am opposed to it for the reason that technology, if given too much autonomy will and already is rendering us useless as a species. People need to learn practical skills, even ones as simple as taking responsibility for our own safety when crossing a road. How many times have we all despaired as we have had to brake to avoid hitting a gormless fucking kid who's just stepped off a kerb, not paying attention to anything but their phone. That's why we have to smash up our suspension on speed humps when driving in a 2 mile radius of a school. The green cross code is long forgotten and kids are not expected to look, listen etc. Same with tech which drives your car while you stare at a screen, unaware of what's going on around you. There are shit drivers as Bill has mentioned, well ban the cunts then and leave driving to the competent. If we allow technology to do everything for us, we will as a species end up a gormless race of useless cunts, reliant on computers to make every decision and have no practical skills or purpose. Most of us as kids, could probably dismantle, repair and reassemble a bicycle, change a plug and pitch a tent. Most 15 year olds now can't do anything but text, download 'choons' and upload photos of their genitalia. Technology should assist us to achieve, not achieve for us.

This is exactly what people said during the industrial revolution, whilst trying to smash up machinery that was automating humans out of a job.

Living standards and conditions have improved immensely since then, and most people remain employed, albeit it that many jobs today people could not even fathom existing back then.

Progress towards safer, cleaner, more efficient driving is not going to be halted to make sure a few people don't lose their jobs. 

[Eric Cuntman]

20 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said:

This is exactly what people said during the industrial revolution, whilst trying to smash up machinery that was automating humans out of a job.

Living standards and conditions have improved immensely since then, and most people remain employed, albeit it that many jobs today people could not even fathom existing back then.

Progress towards safer, cleaner, more efficient driving is not going to be halted to make sure a few people don't lose their jobs. 

You're missing my point. I was more worried about technology taking away our ability to think for ourselves, not our jobs. If everything we once had to do for ourselves is delegated to a black box, we'll one day reach a stage whereby a large section of the population will end up staring dribbling at their shoelaces because Alexa hasn't said "left over right, right over left, make a loop....

[Guest Bill Stickers]

5 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

You're missing my point. I was more worried about technology taking away our ability to think for ourselves, not our jobs. If everything we once had to do for ourselves is delegated to a black box, we'll one day reach a stage whereby a large section of the population will end up staring dribbling at their shoelaces because Alexa hasn't said "left over right, right over left, make a loop....

I think we genuinely passed that point a long time ago. I've no idea what you do for a living, but in the event of societal collapse would you be able to properly feed yourself? I doubt most in the UK could.