Earl of Punkape Posted December 31, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 40 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said: A shameless and unattributed cut & paste from the Spectator. God hates plagiarists. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/06/nhs-shouldnt-fund-drug-prevents-hiv/ I never said it was mine..... Ir was so obviously from the Spectator..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadkill Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 4 minutes ago, Punkape said: I never said it was mine..... Ir was so obviously from the Spectator..... This is low even for you, Punkers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 9 minutes ago, Punkape said: I never said it was mine..... Ir was so obviously from the Spectator..... Obviously. That's why you didn't give due credit to the author of the work before seeing if you could pass it off as your own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfie Noakes Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 Pile of shit, plagiarism. You should always credit the author, shame on you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camberwell gypsy Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 2 hours ago, Punkape said: More utter shite What would you say if a powerful cyclists’ pressure group ganged up on the NHS and lobbied it to provide free cycle helmets to anyone who asked for one, accusing it of having on its hands the blood of every helmet-less cyclist who died while the NHS tried to spurn the demand? I think I can guess the answer in the case of most readers: fuck off and buy your own helmets. Why, then, does it become such a different matter when the National Aids Trust demands that the NHS provide a free supply of a drug known as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP, to people who want to have unprotected sex with multiple partners. The proposal has raised hardly any protest other than a dry response from the NHS itself that it wasn’t sure whether it had the authority to prescribe a drug which is purely preventative – or whether that should come under local authorities. The idea was backed by Max Pemberton, editor of Spectator Health, last November. The government has now asked NICE, the quango charged with judging the costs versus benefits of drugs, to carry out a review. It is not hard to guess what will come next. After a bit more bashing from the likes of the National Aids Trust – which has threatened a judicial review on the grounds of ‘discrimination’ — the government, afraid of being accused of homophobia, will give in. It shouldn’t. If you are going to set a precedent whereby the NHS is expected to fund protective equipment to help people cope with the dangers inherent in their pastimes there will be no containing NHS spending. What would be the argument then for the NHS not providing free ropes and crampons to mountaineers or flameproof suits to motor-racing drivers? If they save lives, why not? It is outrageous for the National Aids Trust to claim that failing to provide free PrEP is discriminatory. It isn’t just gay people who are at risk from HIV infection. Heterosexuals run the risk, too, if they engage in unprotected sex with multiple partners. Moreover, only some gay men are promiscuous, and many are not even sexually active at all. It is a free choice for anyone to engage in risky sex, and not one that it should be the job of the NHS to encourage – especially given that the drug isn’t exactly a guarantee against infection. One study suggests a 92 to 99 per cent reduction in risk of HIV transmission for people who take the drug every day, falling off rapidly for those who fail to keep up this rigid regime, as many in the trial did. Anyone who does choose to take the risks of unprotected sex, of course, has the option of buying the drug themselves. According to the NHS chief executive this week it costs £355 for 30 tablets. There, that’s the price of a couple of drinks a pop. Or, according to Max Pemberton, you can get a year’s supply from India for £600. So, if you want unprotected, promiscuous sex, stop moaning and embrace the globalised drug industry. Or stop being a fucking pervert. NICE are generally made up of Dr's and nurses who no longer practice in the real world. I met several of them at medical conferences and found them to be totally removed from what's happening in the real world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Extremecunt Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 10 minutes ago, Extremecunt said: FUCK OFF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Piston Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 2 hours ago, Cuntybaws said: A shameless and unattributed cut & paste from the Spectator. God hates plagiarists. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/06/nhs-shouldnt-fund-drug-prevents-hiv/ Overindulgence in the Spectator is known to heighten the risk of neurological damage including: Literotic kleptomania and chronic Arseitis. If only there was a drug, available on the NHS which, taken regularly might provide a measure of protection to those addicted to such periodicals... PS Good spot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ape™️ Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 2 hours ago, Cuntybaws said: A shameless and unattributed cut & paste from the Spectator. God hates plagiarists. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/06/nhs-shouldnt-fund-drug-prevents-hiv/ He especially hates gay ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 5 hours ago, camberwell gypsy said: NICE are generally made up of Dr's and nurses who no longer practice in the real world. I met several of them at medical conferences and found them to be totally removed from what's happening in the real world. Very true. Bunch of fucking idiots the lot of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest I know that Cunt Posted January 1, 2017 Report Share Posted January 1, 2017 Whoever wrote it is irrelevant if the content is true which it appears to be. Why should the NHS [taxpayer] pay for a risk management treatment when the risk could have been prevented in the first place if they had not bummed each others smelly arses. If they must be ruled by their preversions, wear a double strength rubber gayboy johnny you irresponsible cunts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl of Punkape Posted May 27, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 27, 2017 On 01/01/2017 at 0:30 PM, I know that Cunt said: Whoever wrote it is irrelevant if the content is true which it appears to be. Why should the NHS [taxpayer] pay for a risk management treatment when the risk could have been prevented in the first place if they had not bummed each others smelly arses. If they must be ruled by their preversions, wear a double strength rubber gayboy johnny you irresponsible cunts. Abstinence is best... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mingeeta Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 7 hours ago, Punkape said: Abstinence is best... Why? How the fuck would you get your end away with Leroy and his chums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 On 31/12/2016 at 10:25 AM, Punkape said: falling off rapidly for those who fail to keep up this rigid regime, as many in the trial did. I bet that you like rigid things spunkely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfie Noakes Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 Just because punkape can pay for his, doesn't mean anyone else should be denied it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl of Punkape Posted May 28, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 3 hours ago, Alfie Noakes said: Just because punkape can pay for his, doesn't mean anyone else should be denied it. People who are no longer gay, are rebuked by gays for no longer being gay. Gays always accuse their accusers of being gay. David Makepiece-Cayley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 23 hours ago, Punkape said: Abstinence is best... You tedious, boring fucking cunt. You resurrect your own shit nom? Fuck off and kill yourself. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubby Pecker Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 6 minutes ago, Wizardsleeve said: You tedious, boring fucking cunt. You resurrect your own shit nom? Fuck off and kill yourself. LOL Here, here and bravo old bean. Punkape is a massive raging bender who also likes sex with men-Black men, several at a time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, Stubby Pecker said: Here, here and bravo old bean. Punkape is a massive raging bender who also likes sex with men-Black men, several at a time. Canal Street is probably alive with activity with him out on the job. Which will inevitably mean a spike in new reported cases of HIV/AIDS and make the case for more free clinics and a carpet bombing of free condoms. The diseased, disgusting little shitstabber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 On topic, I am not a fan of the shirters as well documented on these pages. I do think there will be always be those that can't keep their cock in their trousers, whether straight or gay. Ultimately, it is a lifestyle choice. If we apply the same principle to other lifestyle choices e.g telling smokers they can't have inhalers for their COPD or type 2 fatties their metformin is no longer free, where is it all leading? A slippery slope that will give the shitbags at the department of health mouthpiece NICE more opportunity to rationalise healthcare in UK. It is more cost effective to prevent HIV than to spend money for years treating someone who has it. That is justification. I don't like it, but in reality it makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, The Beast said: On topic, I am not a fan of the shirters as well documented on these pages. I do think there will be always be those that can't keep their cock in their trousers, whether straight or gay. Ultimately, it is a lifestyle choice. If we apply the same principle to other lifestyle choices e.g telling smokers you can't have your inhalers for your COPD or type 2 fatties their metformin is no longer free, where is it all leading? A slippery slope that will give the shitbags at the department of health mouthpiece NICE more opportunity to rationalise healthcare in UK. It is more cost effective to prevent HIV than to spend money for years treating someone who has it. That is justification. I don't like it, but in reality it makes sense. Sadly, the blood spatter from kicking fuck out of the infected bastard can also spread the disease, but the one doing the kicking is doing the public a service by preventing the spread. Stay inside your bedsit, punky, you'll be safe there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfie Noakes Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 18 hours ago, Punkape said: People who are no longer gay, are rebuked by gays for no longer being gay. Gays always accuse their accusers of being gay. David Makepiece-Cayley. Under that logic you are a queer, atheist, Nigerian, rim licking, cum bucket, gimp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 19 hours ago, Punkape said: David Makepiece-Cayley. With a name like that he must be a gayboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 19 hours ago, Punkape said: People who are no longer gay, are rebuked by gays for no longer being gay. Gays always accuse their accusers of being gay. David Makepiece-Cayley. Repeat bollocks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfie Noakes Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 20 minutes ago, The Lady Penelope said: Repeat bollocks Bollocks. There you are, shit has it been done already? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.